BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jan 1997 16:47:45 -0700
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> from "Palm, Kevin R." at Jan 3, 97 04:16:00 pm
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From:
Jerry J Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
I oppose splitting just to do what was originally intended.  Bee-L was
started to talk about bee biology.  The diversity of hobbiests, commercial
beekeepers, apicultural inspectors, and researchers adds to the information
exchange.  The problem should not be re-starting lists.  At issue is the
purpose, which people quickly forget.  The objective is to discuss bee
biology - if we could stick to that topic, it wouldn't matter who made up the
list and there would be no need to split.
 
Jerry Bromenshenk
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2