Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 13:53:08 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Organization: |
InfiNet |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Roy Nettlebeck wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 1997, Dr. Pedro Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > [log in to unmask] wrote:
> > >
> THE ONLY WAY they can: making
> > ridicule of things that they have not done! Right Mr. Bromenshek? You
> > know what I am talking about, don't you? I wonder what your words will
> > be when beekeepers find that my findings are useful? You'll find
> > something, wont you? Your kind always does. I would like to have your
> > postal address so that I may send you a nice Crow and a box of tissues
> > to wipe the egg off your face.
>
> Dear Pedro , I feel sorry for you.Before you go out attacking Jerry or
> anyone else , read what they are saying.You want this to be a war. We need
> real fixs and people working together.We are not calling your work a hoax.
> I will say that you are wrong about others not using mineral oil. I
> have!You are writting to thousands of years of beekeeping expierence. We
> are reading your posting.I would suggest that you keep them professional
> so people don't get into a habit of pushing the D button when they see
> your name.By the way , Jerry is a very highly regarded researcher and has
> done much for beekeeping.He works (with ) everyone and has respect from
> the beekeeping community , plus other researchers.
> Just to let you know my background, I was a resource manager over 3,000
> people up to the time I retired 3 + years ago.I had to put the right
> people in the right place , so we could get our jobs done. Some were
> nuclear , some were dealing with Haz-material.Many rules to follow and you
> never jumped in with your eyes closed.I was responsible to up hold all the
> rules of the EPA. ( 5000 pages on PC'Bs alone) I had to understand people
> and could see someone blowing smoke a mile off. I did not attack
> you.Science is science and it takes had data and then many more tests by
> others to get the whole group to belive it.Albert Einstein did not publish
> or let his work out for 2 years because he had such a high regard for
> Rutherfurd. He was going to change all of science. Plus he had no
> proofs.We are just now being able to prove out some of his ideas.It is
> better to lay out the facts on the table and let them speak for
> themselves.Its like raising children, it is not what you say, but it is
> what you do that the children follow.On that count , I have 2 at the U of
> Wash and the other one in a private school.I belive in education and
> continue to go to school at 55.Now I'm trying to lean these machines.We
> have many varried skills on this list and need all of them for it to work
> well.The only war we need is against Varroa and Viruses.
> Best Regards
> Roy
WHY THEN ATTACK MY WORK WITHOUT THE SLIGHTEST IDEA OF WHAT IS CONSISTS?
YES, THERE IS A WAR, I WOULD SAY! VERY PERSONNAL AT THAT! AGAINST ONE
DR. PEDRO RODRIGUEZ.
GOOD BYE DO GOODDERS!
|
|
|