Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 1997 17:04:48 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In message <B1749ZWRMBW93P*/R=GALAXY/R=A1/U=KCLARK/@MHS>, "Kerry Clark
of AGF 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299" <[log in to unmask]> writes
> Dave Black wrote,
> > "I'd be inclined to select the mites not the bee."
>
> I agree that it would be easier, and there's also the possible strategy
> of importing selected non pathogenic mites, but it's not obvious to me
> that such mites (either selected in place, or imported) would solve the
> varroa problem.
I was thinking along the lines of your earlier post...
>when unselected bee stock is brought (without varroa) into
>the area, it too becomes only moderately infested and does not
>require treatment. The key difference seems to be that 50 to 60 %
>of these varroa in worker brood are infertile.
Maybe we could breed in infertility to the new subspecies 'European
Mite' Varroa jackobsoni europeaus. :-)
--
Dave Black
<http://www.guildford.ac.uk/beehive>,
Guildford, GU1 4RN. UK.
|
|
|