Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 24 Jun 1994 10:09:17 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi:
The discussion on border closing and the history has been interesting.
In Montana, we first saw both mite species in colonies of migratory
beekeepers. First a few, now virtually all (as far as I can tell) of
these operators.
In spite of regular treatment with strips, etc., we have no problem finding
either mite. Until recently, most of our hobbiest and non-migratory commercial
beekeepers have been free of Varroa, although Tracheal mites became more
or less endemic. Packages or queens bought in the last 2-3 years are
one potential source of introduction of T. mite to the colonies
maintained by these beekeepers.
This year, we have begun to find Varroa in hobbiest and
non-migratory operations. Based on discussions with the beekeepers, I
think hived swarms are a likely contributor to the problem.
We suggest treating any swarms to suppress mites - the swarm may be a
consequence of the natural division of a strong, healthy colony.
However, the swarm may be from an infested colony that absconded from
their hive. We have observed this response and have heard other reports
of this happening.
So -- a swarm may be a colony that left its hive. Why remains unknown.
Perhaps it is a desperation move to purge the colony of mites. Possibly
the mites influence bee behaviour, maybe as a means of enhancing
dispersement.
Whatever, swarms should be regarded as a likely source of mites.
Jerry Bromenshenk
The University of Montana
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|