> [the video] mentions widespread pollution, including aluminum, from fallout from these modification activities.
The video presents things that are overtly false.
I may be the only beekeeper to make regular trips to Amundsen-Scott station at the geographic south pole, so I have had the benefit of one-on-one tutoring from multiple climate scientists from Jan through March every other year or so. I am just a humble physicist, not a climate scientist, but the basic problems with ALL the "solar geoengineering" proposals do not require specialized education, or advanced math:
a) They don't do anything to slow or stop the ocean acidification caused by greenhouse gas emissions. This is simple chemistry. Too much acidification, and everything dies because the lowest rungs in the food chain die because they can't make shells due to a lack of free calcium carbonate. (I very recently mentioned this, in a "Habitat Loss" thread.)
b) "Carbon capture" propaganda never mentions that emissions from coal-fired power plants contain about 300 times as much CO2 as the Earth’s atmosphere. So, capturing 90% of that CO2 still lets an unacceptable amount of CO2 out. Even if we could remove 99% of CO2 from coal plant exhaust, (a very costly job that no one can do yet) we'd still have emissions with CO2 concentrations higher than the atmosphere. The only way to "win" here is to stop burning coal entirely, ASAP. The good news is that is it cheaper to build new solar and wind than continue to operate a mine-mouth coal plant, so investors are forcing coal plants to shut down, and put up windmills on the same hills that they used to do "mountaintop removal" to get at the coal.
c) The UN Convention on Biological Diversity established a moratorium on "geoengineering" projects in 2015. 196 countries signed the declaration. The proposals are nothing more than proposals.
https://www.cbd.int/climate/geoengineering/
d) All these speculative proposals for "geoengineering" are being trumpeted by fossil fuel interests to justify continued greenhouse gas emissions.
As for "chemtrails"....
a) The "stopping and restarting" of a plane's condensation trail is nothing nefarious. There are areas of higher and lower humidity in the sky. Regions with high humidity condense into visible water in the sky all the time - we call those regions with the higher humidity "CLOUDS".
b) The photos offered of "chemtrail equipment" are easy to identify (for any pilot) as perfectly normal parts of airplanes with clear purpose.
The first image he shows is a completely normal set of "pylon drain pipes" common to Airbus airframes A319, A320, and A321. They simply drain out any water than might get into the plyons.
I'll stop with that one example, as in looking for better photos, I found an excellent set of videos thoroughly debunking of the "Geoengineering Watch" fellow here:
https://www.youtube.com/c/GeoengineeringWatchDebunked/videos
https://tinyurl.com/34xzcrjt
I need not add more about RFK Jr. This article does a far better job, and has references and citations.
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/05/rfk-jr-is-a-lying-crank-posing-as-a-progressive-alternative
https://tinyurl.com/5789x3sd
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|