BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date:
Thu, 22 Feb 2024 21:55:54 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
> ...a hypothesis in mind and then looked to see if figures might support it.

So, this effort was different.  It was confirmation bias - forming a viewpoint first, and then looking for data to support that viewpoint, but not looking for data to refute that viewpoint.

The problem with the "big data" available, and the wealth of online resources is that one is very likely to find data to support almost anything one looks for.

But I did an undergrad paper (for "Course 6" at a small vocational school across the Charles from the Esplanade) on confirmation bias, so I know a bit about it.  My summary of my paper was:

Based on anecdotal data from a sample size of 12 non-random people, confirmation bias has been confirmed to not exist. 
This was verified by ignoring data that disagreed with the proposition that it does not exist.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2