Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:46:56 -0600 |
Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>The thesis has not moved the ball down the field at all...
To make sure we are on the same page, I understand that this is the essential nugget from the current research under consideration:
'By using porous material correlations, analysis of previous findings and a model of a cluster within a hive in a landscape that implements convection, conduction and radiation, we show that a honeybee colony increases in thermal conductivity, on transition from pre-cluster to dense mantle, by a factor of approximately 2, and insulation R-value can decrease by more than 11.'
So while I can understand taking umbrage with the conclusions drawn from this observation, it appears that the fluid mechanics undergirding this observation are fairly sound - so this appears to me to be something noteworthy that deserves further consideration.
In a previous paper, Mr. Mitchell looked into the question of approximating a tree cavity (attached). This paper is in a similar vein to Seeley and Radcliffe's field observations (also attached), which added occupied insulated and uninsulated colonies to the mix for comparison.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|