BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Russ Litsinger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:46:56 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
>The thesis has not moved the ball down the field at all...

To make sure we are on the same page, I understand that this is the essential nugget from the current research under consideration:

'By using porous material correlations, analysis of previous findings and a model of a cluster within a hive in a landscape that implements convection, conduction and radiation, we show that a honeybee colony increases in thermal conductivity, on transition from pre-cluster to dense mantle, by a factor of approximately 2, and insulation R-value can decrease by more than 11.'  

So while I can understand taking umbrage with the conclusions drawn from this observation, it appears that the fluid mechanics undergirding this observation are fairly sound - so this appears to me to be something noteworthy that deserves further consideration.

In a previous paper, Mr. Mitchell looked into the question of approximating a tree cavity (attached). This paper is in a similar vein to Seeley and Radcliffe's field observations (also attached), which added occupied insulated and uninsulated colonies to the mix for comparison.


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2