BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:09:50 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From:
Randy Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
The results of the sugar syrup dilution study are surprising.  He compared
syrups in the range of 50% sugar down to 43%.
That's not much difference to get the surprisingly different results in
colony performance that he recorded!
And what's unfortunate is that he hadn't expanded that range, since he
didn't find an asymptote -- would even lower dilutions have continued to
improve performance?

Re GOX - H2O2, the authors of the study concluded that "no difference in
the GOX content and the level of H2O2 was found between natural honeys and
bee-processed syrups."

I myself often feed syrup diluted to less than 50% for stimulation, but
have never collected data, since we don't need to stimulate that often, and
feed more to avert starvation due to unexpected weather or failure of
expected bloom.

Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
530 277 4450
ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2