BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:20:43 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
The one pesticide analysis that I've seen of beeswax foundation "from the
good old days" was loaded with nasty pesticides and chemicals that have had
their registrations revoked.

DDT. DDE, DDD residues continued to show up in our wax samples until about 2010.  That's a long-time after the ban in the USA.  The chlorinated pesticides can remain in wax for years, maybe decades.  The newer replacements generally have short residue times.  However, there is evidence of some soil buildup of some of the neonics in fields that are repeatedly used.  From my own work, soil dust exposures may not be limited to planting times.  Bees are fuzzy, electrostatically charged, flying dust mops - nature's version of a swiffer pad.   The National Research Council years ago recognized that bees were excellent monitors of airborne chemicals, and I've published with Bruce Lighthart papers on scavanging of biologicals, including viruses and even anthrax and human stds (near a microbiology laboratory).

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2