BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:46:48 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Oxalic Acid Sublimation
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Seth Charbonneau <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
deeper dive in to Ramesh Sagili 's work with mite reductions numbers
https://tvbabees.org/resources/Documents/TVBA_Sagili_Feb25_2020.pdf

As I read it a single oav treatment had reduced eggs by 14%, young larva by 7.7% and older larva by 4.5 %.  compared to control,  while the mites grew by 77% in 3 weeks vs a 81% reduction in mites for the formic.

I wonder what the brood damage would have been if they used enuf OAV treatments to gain mite control, seems odd to test brood damage  with one treatment at a level that doesn't control mites and the outer at one that does
Seth C



             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2