BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:59:04 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
> Female workers result from mismatched sex alleles, and a nonviable male (drone) results from matching sex alleles.  If a breeding population is to have the best chance of minimal inbreeding, and  hence minimal nonviable larvae from eggs

The conventional wisdom is that inbreeding can be recognized by a scattered brood pattern. Recent work calls that into question:

> We observed that brood patterns of queens originally from poor-brood colonies significantly improved after placement into a good-brood colony after 21 days, suggesting factors other than the queen contributed to brood pattern.

Lee, Kathleen V., et al. "Is the Brood Pattern within a Honey Bee Colony a Reliable Indicator of Queen Quality?." Insects 10.1 (2019): 12.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2