BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Evans <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:43:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
>Gene Ash
>Comments like poorly managed and mite and virus riddled are almost always SPECULATIVE comments (and often time not much more than gossip).

I agree these are sometimes speculative, but not in this instance. We've been monitoring 50+ colonies for treatment regime, mite levels, virus load and overwinter survival managed by amateur beekeepers. Some colonies had mite counts of 5,000 - 15,000 and DWV levels were of the order of 10^10 genome equivalents per bee. Winter losses were commensurate with this at ~55%.

Whilst we might not be smart enough to tell people exactly how to manage their bees, the principles are well-established - good observation, intervention when appropriate using a treatment in the approved manner. 

It's interesting that there are regulations in place for the management of a variety of livestock, but generally not for bees (when these are often considered livestock). The livestock regulations are there to protect the livestock - where you could consider preventing undue suffering is an ethical issue - and to prevent disease transmission to other species (including sometimes to humans). 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2