BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:52:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
I have received a very pointed question about , my comments on "packages",
which I find apt.

The challenge posed by an almond pollinator who shakes package bees from his
hives post-almonds  is "If California packages are so full of diseases and
pests, how did those hives get graded as strong enough to be worthy of an
almond pollination fee?"

This is an excellent rebuttal, but my reply would be that the massive number
of hives from all corners of the continent brought to one fairly small area,
assures by proximity alone that 100% of all pathogens, pests, and diseases
are present in sufficient numbers of bees to assure ubiquitous disease
spread.  So, it's not the health of the bees going into the Almonds - it's
the health of the bees coming out.

Further, beekeepers will combine weak hives to "make the grade", so while
these hives may look sufficiently strong, they may not be as healthy as they
might seem.  I would think that looking at the amount of open brood in each
hive would detect this, but I do not think that grading can ever be so
in-depth at the scale of grading thousands of colonies.

I've said before - "Almonds Did For Beekeeping What Cocaine Did For Miami"

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2