BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Dec 2020 12:37:12 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_038B_01D6C7DE.B1B40340"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2759 bytes) , Bee_Map_Fig_2.png (27 kB)
> I have in the past cast doubt on the notion that there are valid races of
bees in the USA.

There are at least two USA groups that we could call distinct "races", even
if both are hybridized and human-introduced.

Very solid genome evidence has been identified to differentiate at least 4
subspecies that evolved in Europe, Africa, and Asia: "M" (mellifera,
iberiensis), "C" (ligustica, carnica),  "O" (anatoliaca, caucasica, syriaca,
pomonella),  and "A" (scutellata, lamarckii, capensis, litorea, unicolor,
intermissa).  There are also "Y" (Ethiopian) and "S" (Syria/Lebanon)
lineages, but there still is some question about how distinct they are from
the "A" group.

See attached map "Fig 2" from:

https://nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71393-0
https://tinyurl.com/yxqjm6gv

Other good articles on the subject are:

https://frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2016.00140/full
https://tinyurl.com/y5pjb6ou

and this one, paywalled, so saved here: 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WnE8sus3DXIIPr3ZYyNrZG5yWTa0SneI/view?usp=s
haring
https://tinyurl.com/y3a2l6mo

Given the above, North America has at least the significantly hybridized
non-Africanized group, (bred from any or all of M, C, and O, from above) and
the Africanized hybrid group, which seems to be the only "A" genetics in
North America.

So, while both groups are hybrids, their genetics, geographic ranges, and
their behavior are different enough to differ between them, and classify
them as distinct subspecies, even if the hand of man was involved in the
transport of the genetics.  

A similar problem exists with penguins.  Most of the "similar" penguins are
so isolated from each other as to never meet, so even those that might
interbreed, don't.  What was thought to be 18 distinct species was claimed
to be 19, and the argument over that spilt led to the work that found 28
total subspecies or "types".  ("Types", because if you call anything a
"subspecies" in public, taxonomists send you long, whining, pedantic letters
about how they are the sole arbiters....)  

https://www.aquarium.co.za/blog/entry/26-types-of-penguin-the-cutest-list-on
-the-internet
https://tinyurl.com/y5gsadmq

Red Wolves are a species where "reintroduction" might be better described as
"re-invention".  Red Wolves were thought to be gray wolf/coyote hybrids, so
Eastern Wolves were bred with coyotes, and released in eastern NC as "Red
Wolves". Later genetic work made things more complicated - Gray Wolves never
did hybridize with coyotes much.  (Coyotes are often too preoccupied with
complex schemes to drop anvils on Roadrunners...)






             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2