Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:17:23 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> This comment seems inapposite when made in a forum that went into great detail on the selection of dissection microscopes to better see the innards of small insects
For once I agree with you. In fact, I bought one of those microscopes that was advertised as "recommended by Randy Oliver." At the time one of my lab members (Dr. H) asked why on earth I would want to buy my own microscope, especially seeing how we had two (2) Zeiss scopes which probably cost $100,000 apiece ten years ago.
With these babies we imaged chromosomes. Somehow the experience of witnessing grad students and postdocs spending hundreds of hours in a small dark room looking for just the right shot of aberrant chromosomes, left me with no desire to spend time looking through scopes. Dr. H was right.
Another time, Randy O. visited the lab and after a look around, he asked me if we ever have one of those Eureka moments where everyone is jumping up and down. I thought for a while, and said "Nope." Most of our discoveries wouldn't mean a thing to more than about a dozen and a half people working in the field, but progress was slow in any case.
PLB
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|