BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:
Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:27:38 -0600
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Queen quality effected by mating nuc size?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
MIke Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
>
>All that to say that perhaps the best size mating nuc is the one that best fits your operation size and management scheme.
>

I agree. My “mini nucs are a deep divided Into four. Works well for me. I catch at 16 days after giving cell. I catch 128 every four days. Four groups of 128. Recatch group one 26 days later. I can unite them from four combs during queen mating season to 16 combs for winter. After winter we build them up on additional combs and split them down to the four way configuration with four combs each. I see no issues with the queens coming out of this system. So many with wood to wood patterns when on standard combs. Many of these queens will perform well for three and four years.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2