BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:58:40 +0100
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Queen eggs bigger than worker eggs?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From:
Beekeepers <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
This raises some interesting questions.

Bees seem to be very aware of their queen's 'quality' (if that is the right word) and will sometimes supersede queens that look good to the beekeeper.

If queens from grafts are seen by the bees as inferior, could this explain the frequent supersedure or failure of bought in queens which has been reported on Bee-L?  For some time I have wondered why this phenomenon seems to be more frequent in the US than here in the UK, but perhaps  more US beekeepers buy in queens than we do over here.

Are the number of ovarioles linked to the amount of queen pheromone produced?

Best wishes

Peter 
52°14'44.44"N, 1°50'35"W

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2