BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Justin Kay <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 May 2019 08:00:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>
>
>
> >I am guessing here Justin that you are confusing RWeaver with BWeaver...


I am not. She said they were RWeaver queens.

While BWeaver gets significantly more attention for rearing varroa
resistant stock, I think it's a fallacy to believe that RWeaver (or any
other queen breeder) isn't selecting for some form of varroa resistance, or
local adaptation.

In any event, RWeaver was selected because they rear queens in the south.
Mike Palmer was selected because he rears queens in the north. Any
implication that these queen breeders were selected in the study because
they raise some level of varroa resistant stock (or any other reason) is
your own implication, not addressed directly in the study. At least as
presented in Delaware's EAS (I don't have access to the published paper, so
can't compare the presentation to the article).


>

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2