BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Sep 2020 23:01:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>>> ...I've been pushing for a generic "Approved application method"
>>> submitted by either USDA or a third party not interested in making a profit.

The OA label already approved has approved application methods, but I don't know how EPA might isolate "a label" from a specific registered product.
Has this ever been done before with an EPA-registered pesticide?  

I would think the primary concern would be for a beekeeper to (somehow) be assured of buying the "correct product", in this case a "pure OA".  Sounds simple, until we remember the dog food that had the Melamine in it, and killed dogs left and right.  I'm not saying the idea is a non-starter, I just don't know how anyone might shoehorn something like that into the existing regulatory scheme.  


  

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2