BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:27:14 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
>
>
> >"It is important to note that the calculation of bee toxic load
> provides information about the total toxicity of insecticides applied to a
> landscape,"
>
Ah, details, details.
Yes, 120x the total POTENTIAL toxicity applied to the LANDSCAPE, but not
the amount to which bees are exposed.
A recent study by the Krupe lab concluded that:
" A maximum of 1.34% of the initial seed treatment was successfully
recovered from [maize] plant tissues in both study years."
Of that percent, only a tiny fraction would wind up in the pollen.
Thus, toxicity to which bees are exposed may well have actually DECREASED
-- an observation widely reported by beekeepers in the Corn Belt.

Alford A, Krupke CH (2017) Translocation of the neonicotinoid seed
treatment clothianidin in maize. PLOS ONE 12(10): e0186527.
-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2