Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Feb 2021 12:33:04 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The content of this thread reveals the desperation amongst beekeepers to find a suite of effective anti-Varroa tools. In my locale, there is a growing sense that beekeepers are overdependent on OA, and OAV in particular is not as effective as we'd like...or perhaps expect. We are hamstrung by a lack of understanding of exactly how OA targets the mites, a grasp of best delivery methods/schedules, and a paucity of control options.
As a beekeeper I welcome the flow of research $$ into labs doing Varroa studies, and which are examining non-toxic Varroa control. Dr. Jack's study raises some interesting questions we'd all like to see answered.
On the topic of queen caging: here in northern, short-summer areas, particularly those with limited nectar flows, queen caging is not an option...or at least is not a good option. There are other ways to achieve the goal of queen caging (to render a colony broodless prior to treatment for Varroa) without sacrificing queen productivity.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|