BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:52:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
> thickness of each additional layer of cocoon is so thin as to provide little in the way of additional R value to the walls of the comb, unless of course the silk/adhesive combination have remarkable R value capabilities.

Study by Berry and Delaplane found that old combs weigh 1.6 times as much as new ones, and the cells are 94% as large, so the accumulation of material, whatever it is -- is substantial. Whether it has a negative or positive effect is another question. They found that the smaller cells were a deterrent to queen laying but that survivorship was greater among bees reared in old comb. 

Peter L Borst

Jennifer A Berry & Keith S Delaplane (2001) Effects of comb age on honey bee colony growth and brood survivorship, Journal of Apicultural Research, 40:1, 3-8, DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2001.11101042

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2