BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:52:58 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>
>
> >So, what we have is both sides telling the other side they are nuts.
> Neither side seems to pay any attention to the other side.
>

I agree with Dick.  But check actual numbers, rather than exaggerated
claims.  Unfortunately, most researchers start trials with commercial
stock, which is not normally bred for mite resistance.  We could use a lot
more hard-data tracking of colony survival with whatever genetic lines are
being kept by successful TF folk.

And Dick is spot on about location/local climate, as well as amount of
swarming (which reduces mite loads to some extent).

Stay open minded and ask for hard numbers.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2