BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ted Hancock <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 29 Apr 2018 12:27:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
A seven step review of how the bee bought-the-farm:

Chemical company (CC) markets new insecticide (NI) as safe for bees. Prefers to call it a pesticide. Develops seven different formulations of NI.

Many beekeepers suspect NI is killing their bees.

CC and their supporters blame piss poor beekeeping for bee losses. Also blame varroa mites. CC sculptures idol in varroa’s likeness.

CC funds numerous studies proving NI is harmless to bees.

CC funds recent study that shows two of the lesser known formulations of NI are not toxic to bees. Now admit that other five formulations are “ as intrinsically toxic to bees as to the insect pests they target.” (https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(18)30230-6)

CC announces one of their top ten commandments is to “Avoid wasting time and money”. Supporters interpret this as proof that CC possesses lofty moral virtues and can be trusted not to kill bees.

CC continues to sell formulations of NI that are highly toxic to bees.

Thinking its hard not to bee sarcastic with a story like this,

Ted

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2