BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:30:40 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: DWV test results for Newfoundland bee stock
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Peter Armitage <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines) 
I had lunch yesterday with a member of our beek association research committee who is a medical researcher familiar with PCR methodologies.  He wondered about the PCR primers used in the Shutler, et al. paper for DWV diagnosis and suggested they could have had false positives for DWV because they amplified “junk.”  This stuff is over my head.  Anyone have a comment on these DWV primers? See Table 1 here http://nlbeekeeping.ca/data/documents/shutler_etal_2014.pdf 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2