Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:14:05 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> 42ish% losses for those who did monitor, about the same for those who did not (but presumbably treated on a schedule).
Monitoring is worthwhile in any case. People should do this, not just treat on a calendar. IPM dictates that you assess and then treat, as needed. It may be that the treatment time is about the same every year, but just as the calendar says spring starts in March, that doesn't mean it's safe to put your house plants out.
And there's this:
> About one-fifth of U.S. adults get an annual physical. “A number of randomized controlled trials now show that these yearly exams don’t improve people’s health or health outcomes,” says Ateev Mehrotra, M.D., an associate professor of health care policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School.
Also: Just because someone monitors and treats, it does not follow that they have done it correctly or in a timely fashion.
PLB
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|