Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 15 Mar 2018 19:27:31 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
a Peter Loring Borst snip followed by > my comment..
I don't use honeybee, either, though Seeley does.
In Google Scholar, "honeybee" gets 140,000 hits while "honey bee" gets 289,000.
For best results use: "honeybee" OR "honey bee" -- that brings up 325,000 citations. I have read them all, too.
> I once had a conversation about this difference with Dr Thomas (he has his name on the bee lab and apiary inspection building at Texas A&M) and he told me he was there when this convention was decided upon for publication here in the US. Might get this backward but I seem to recall honey bee was considered proper in England but honeybee was the proper term in the US. I would guess us non academic types can use either and no one would be much confused?
Gene in central Texas...
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|