BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:48:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
>
> •       Is a fresh, low-nutrient pollen like corn of higher value than a
> higher-nutrient pollen like almond that is months-old? Or is the amino acid
> mix more important than the age?
>

Both are important, so can't say that one would be better than the other.


> •       Do nurse bees prefer fresh, low-value pollen over stored,
> high-value pollen?
>

I don't know of any hard data, but Kirk Anderson's studies suggest fresh.


> •       Is pollen substitute of higher or lower value than high-nutrient
> pollen that has been overwintered as beebread?
>

Again, no hard data.  Would depend greatly upon the fresh value of each.
But in general, long-aged beebread is discarded by the bees.


> •       Do nurse bees prefer real, stored pollen or fresh pollen
> substitute?
>

From my own trials, they consume fresh incoming pollen preferentially, and
ignore pollen sub during a good pollen flow.  But they EAGERLY consume a
good sub if there is any shortage of incoming pollen.



-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2