Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:59:16 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> > OVA apparatus...is faster per hive than any alternative and with
> reasonable safety precautions it is as safe as any other treatment method
> and probably safer than some alternatives such as thymol.
>
I've used all of the above. The fastest for us is OA dribble, at less than
30 sec for a double, with better efficacy than a single vaporization.
As far as safety, me and all my crew, after years of experience with all
the aforementioned methods, feel that OAV is the most hazardous to the
operator.
>
> >When you get to a few hundred hives one of the OA blasters that costs a
> couple of thousand $ becomes real attractive as it reduces treatment times
> to a few seconds per hive. Under ten seconds per hive from what I hear.
>
I strongly question the penetration of OAV into the cluster with such a
quick application. I hope to provide hard data on this next season.
Medhat has already investigated this deeply.
--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|