Mr. Villa said before "The intent to counter negative information by a
corporation...  are often linked into a complicated accusation of
conspiracy. The two are not necessarily directly linked in reality, but are
often  interpreted as evidence of collusion."



Here is firsthand evidence of collusion - the Monsanto employees ask for
raises because of it.  Example, employee report from Saltmiras, David
Anthony, dated 2013-08-03, Bates-Stamp MONGLYOI045300 which says
'facilitated' and 'coauthored' [means 'ghostwritten'] letters to journal
editors.



"4 (iii) Successfully facilitated numerous third party expert letters to
the editor which were subsequently published, reflecting the numerous
significant deficiencies, poor study design, biased reporting and  selective
statistics employed by Seralini. In addition, coauthored the Monsanto
letter to the editor with Dan Goldstein and Bruce Hammond."



http://baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/8-Monsanto-Scientist-Admits-to-Leveraging-Relationship-with-Food-and-Chemical-Toxicology-Journal.pdf





: > Can you link or cite your paper refuting Seralini's?

:

: Robert, W., et al. "We request a serious reconsideration of the recent
paper by Seralini..."



This one was one of Monsanto's collusion ghostwriting letters work of David
Saltmiras.



Hoping to read Mr. Oliver's own paper he mentioned.



Conspiracy here is clear, but over a study criticized as "weak".  If the
study quality was so poor, why use bribery and collusion to censor it? No
one is scared about 'cancer', but about Monsanto buying off the journal
editor.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html