Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2016 07:55:23 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> What's wrong with this picture? Tom Seeley was here last week and said the very same thing. Scientists talking to scientists, and not to the people who want to know, and need to know the information.
It's an important question but are you sure the problem lies with the scientists? The general public seems to have a loose grasp on many scientific concepts, including evolution, astrophysics, genetic modification, crop protection, etc.
When there is a strong anti-science bias, it is pretty near impossible to communicate difficult concepts. The public suspects scientists of condescension, obfuscation, and outright lying.
Ironically, the public is surrounded by evidence of the benefits of modern science -- advanced medicine, safe transportation, expanded communication -- the list goes on. And yet, they cling to superstition.
Maybe scientists aren't good at communicating. Maybe the public is not good at paying attention.
PLB
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|