Jerry said:
>Anyone see any problems with the articles re: supposed causation?
This is clearly a drama-driven marketing piece, but considering the "supposed causation", then I'm guessing we're back to hashing out the neurological chemistry of sub-lethal dosages - assuming that's what the Hackenberg's mean by "after-effects of neonic seed coatings". But if the Hackenberg's actually lose 90% of their bees to anything, shouldn't we be seeing the same phenomena in other places? It's a problematic claim on lots of levels.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html