BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:54:37 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<007a01d2a181$83f413f0$8bdc3bd0$@com>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Field trials using beekeepers as guinea pigs: bear in mind that these treatments may 1) do nothing to control mites -- which wastes precious time you could use applying something that's proven; 2) actually harm your colonies. I would recommend staying away from field trials. Let the sponsors try them on hives they purchased. 



????  I too have done trial that do nothing,  but so??  That happens.  In the case outlined the test is for 2 different methods. One of which has no corporate sponsor,  and the other would not trial their product against the other.

Looks like a decent test,  if nothing else the participants are going to learn about mite levels and treatment protocols.  Getting people involved?  Seems to me like a win/win test, with no real downsides.  I am surprised at this response to say the least.


Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2