BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:19:09 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> >I still think that the chief action of smoke is narcotic, it clouds the
> insect's awareness and immobilizes them. It has nothing to do with honey
> gorging or the intention to flee.

> Pete, I'm curious as to what observations support the hypothesis that smoke immobilizes bees--I do not see that.

Poor choice of words on my part, typing while rushing off to work. I meant reduced mobility. I imagine the effect is different on different work groups. 

All beekeepers know that smoke has different effects at different times, and in different quantities. It can be used to drive bees or to reduce flight activity, etc. 

None of this gets at _how and why it works_ however, which is what interests me. The pacifying effect is the most relevant.

Anyway, interesting discussion!

P

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2