Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:31:11 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'll see what I can do Christina : )
I'm currently working with Eyal, and recently spent time with another
expert in the field. This is not about human selective breeding or GMOs,
but rather about what occurs in nature.
> 2. Via the jelly (either via protein priming or RNAi for viruses).
> Can this be done by conventional breeding techniques?
>
Not sure--the virgin queens typically emerge in new colonies, so it would
need to occur at the population level.
>
> 3. Via Vg protein priming in the egg (the recent study that Bill referred
> to, perhaps limited to bacteria).
> Thus, not helpful in thinking about how to make viruses less virulent.
>
Correct, was about bacteria.
>
> 4. Via the endosymbiotic gut bacteria involved in immune response.
> So this isn't about breeding bees, either, is it....more about probiotics?
>
I'm not yet sold on probiotics. I'd rather breed a population of bees that
favors favorable gut bacteria.
>
> 5. And of course epigenetic up regulation of existing portions of the
> genome.
> --Does breeding for epigenetic upregulation of specific portions of the
> genome last once the bees leave a location? As Charles pointed out,
> "resistant bees" often lose resistance once they are moved.
I observe the same. And the recent Coloss study also found the same loss
of benefit. I strongly support breeding locally-adapted populations. I'm
much more positive about this than is my good friend Pete, and feel that I
also have Mom Nature on my side : )
--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|