BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Nov 2015 08:58:48 -0800
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Substandard research
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<97FE61CD3C18449AAC9068FB20E66D92@DigitalDarkroom>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
>
> >I am an advocate for native bees, as well as honey bees, but I sure don't
> like to see this hype.


As am I.

But there is a simple answer to your comment.  All labs need funding.  The
"demise" of the honey bee has been a huge source of funding (from which bee
science in general has *greatly* benefited).

Any lab needs to "market" their research in order to obtain funding.  Did
you notice the figures cited for the Cornell native bee research?  Nearly
$4 million.  Can you blame them for trying to sell themselves : )

Yes, there was some exaggeration, but I don't begrudge them their success
at obtaining funding.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2