Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 10 May 2016 21:38:28 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<20160510213828.3762d2fb@ash> |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 10 May 2016 16:32:42 -0400
Tanya Phillips <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> We are having the same issue with the word QUEEN EXTRUDER vs. what I
> say as queen excluder. Is one way more proper than the other perhaps
> depending on what part of the US you live in? Maybe I am making a
> big deal out of nothing and I am the only one who is bothered by
> this. If the book is created for beginners, then none of you experts
> will be reading it anyway, right??? :) OMG.
>
Well, unless they are describing making queens by squeezing PlayDough
or plastic through a nozzle (extrusion), 'queen extruder' makes
absolutely no sense. It's not a difference of opinion on language,
it's categorically wrong.
steven
------------------------------
Steven Buczkowski
Email: [log in to unmask]
Cell: 413-687-9102 (No texts. Email instead.)
2m/70cm: KB3RRJ (147.135+[156.7]/448.275-[156.7])
Smoke Signal: Two long, Two short. I'll send a rider.
-----------------------------------
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|