BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:39:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
One thing missing in the discussion- all pollens are not created equal.

The discussion implies a standard natural pollen while we know that some
pollen is actually deficient for bees. It is the mix of many that
approaches a "standard".

So there will be some artificial pollen that may approach or meet the
standard but is not as good as the best pollens available. Likewise it will
more than match any of the poor-bee-nutritional pollens that bees bring in.
Check the nutritional value of Dandelion pollen yet we rely on Dandelions
for spring buildup.So we are looking for a manufacturer to produce a
perfect pollen that does not exist in nature.

Add that the beekeeper introduced  pollen is a supplement and we are back
into the HFCS/Sugar vs. nectar argument. In both arguments the beekeeper is
giving a supplement, not a main diet. Most all beekeepers I know use it for
earlier spring buildup, not a yearly feed.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2