Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:24:06 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 7:46 AM, Jose Villa <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Many have had poor experiences with supposedly resistant bees, leading to the concept that their utility may be limited to only certain environments, or to where they originated.
I submit the following as evidence that breeding bees has a limited effect
> 32 colonies derived from various commercial lines kindly supplied by Mr. Linton Briggs were tested for expression of hygienic behaviour using the liquid nitrogen field assay. Of these colonies, 4 (12.5%) exhibited distinct hygienic behaviour, 13 (41%) were distinctly non-hygienic and the remaining 15 (46.5%) intermediate between the two.
> It is very surprising that there has been _no improvement_ in the frequency of the hygienic trait since 1995, as industry has made considerable efforts to distribute hygienic stock (Wilkes & Oldroyd, 2002).
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|