BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Date:
Fri, 31 Jul 2015 06:46:53 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Jose Villa <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Charles, Your observations and comments are intriguing and certainly  
run counter to how I understand the community at large perceives the  
problem of changes in landscape.  From the language in talks and  
documents, there certainly is the perception out there that Roundup- 
ready technology has vastly changed the forage situation for  
pollinators (managed and native), and in a negative way.  This is the  
general view in the ivory towers of academia, the palaces of policy  
and regulation, the halls of congress, the offices of advocacy groups,  
and the living rooms of the average television watching citizen.   
Perhaps a reevaluation and a "ground-check" is in order?  Walking the  
fields rather than driving along the highways and looking at edges  
(which is what I do)? I wonder whether weed scientists may have some  
information that supports your views?

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2