Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:18:33 -0300 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Steve Petrilli wrote:
> "..I assume you mean, monitoring hives and alternatives to chemical
> treatments..."
>
> IPM (Integrated Pest Management) does not mean alternatives to chemical
> treatments. It means not treating until thresholds indicate a treatment
> is necessary or required. You have to test and ascertain whether or not
> you need to treat.
>
In that sense, do not confuse with the "resistant bees" issue. The
frecuency of crossing this threshold will be dependant on that said
resistance, but it is not a pre-requisite for implementing an IPM approach.
In the age of varroa IPM only could mean less treatment, but not No
treatment.
On the other hand, the selected treatment will depend on the inclinations,
desires and taste of each beekeeper.
The reinfectation of varroa is a key issue for a need for coordinated
treatments at neigborhood level, which in essence means a new way to deal
with IPM and the need for a redefinition of threasholds at the neigborhood
level.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|