Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:24:37 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi all
Here's a puzzler for you. In the past few years, beekeepers have been claiming 30% winter losses, whereas 10% used to be considered high. I noticed a significant difference in the old recommendations: take your losses in fall. So, by culling in fall, winter losses are reduced.
By not culling in fall, winter losses increase -- as a percentage of the fall number. Suppose you take the high summer number and the low spring number, which is better -- the old way or the new way? For example, suppose you cull 30% in the fall and get a 10% loss, versus cull 10% and then lose 30%. Which gives the most colonies in spring?
PLB
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|