BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:18:41 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
<F2EBA319FA5E496CACEC642FF560ECA5@D9FD7461>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>
> >We make up claims about "un pollinated
> potential lost"  we just as well make claims about tons of honey missed"
> Its wistful thinking.
>

I tend to agree with you on this Charles.  However, a number of studies on
various crops often suggest that the yield of tested crops indeed improves
(generally in the range of 5-10%) when bees are  brought into crops not
normally given paid pollination.  This information is often not well
disseminated by extension agents.

>
> >High labor cost, transportation and queen production
> are more expense than you think.


You got that right!  Unless one can hire minimum wage labor to do skilled
work, there's not that much profit involved.


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2