BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Dec 2013 23:17:47 -0200
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Honey: constituent or ingredient?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Bil Harley

>  The link is to a document from all the leading Beekeeping associations in
> Europe and their position is that to consider that pollen a constituent
> would remove the protection from beekeepers and favour honey importers.
>

Should I assume from the above statement that your honey have no pollen in
it? Is the same - no pollen in honey -- applicable to the honey produced by
the bees of all the associated members of those European Beekeeping
associations?


>  (P.S. monofloral honey is allowed)
>

How do you know that a honey is monofloral if there is no pollen in it?

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2