Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:05:14 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
.........That was from testing several batches in sugar first, then switching to the alcohol. Always picked up more mites.......
I have never done both ways, but as was mentioned earlier here, about 1/3 of the mites are dislodged with sugar. Because I sample 300 bees, I accept that count as being mites per 100 bees. Does that seem logical?
.........You mention 1/3 and bees crawling back in the hive. My guess is you don’t shake as hard as I did. ......
My sample is done as a sugar ROLL. I place my sample of 300 in the jar (telling them it is just like going to Six Flaggs Great America) and roll them with the sugar for 45 seconds. I then set them aside for 45 seconds followed by another 45 second roll. Next I shake the mites from the jar. I don't know just how accurate this is, but I try for reliability and consistency. That allows me to compare hives and to note changes over time. It does not seem to bother the bees greatly.
I have tried an ether roll. After reading Jerry's comments I don't think I'll got back to it. He makes a good point. Sugar is my thing.
Larry Krengel
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|