BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Jul 2013 06:09:24 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
<0D0C7B96AB1D48B1BA2E8C00DEC0422F@LionelPC>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>>Anyhow, there are no controls. Virtually all Alberta hives are in this

> >>experiment.


This is why Cutler and Scott-Dupree went to great length to isolate their
test fields from other potential sources of either canola or neonic
exposure in their recent trial.  Their study should not have any question
about lack of proper controls.
-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2