BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Wed, 5 Dec 2012 08:15:29 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
> This is probably not the answer your looking for, but I read about it and tried it this year, so far so good.  Thicker topbars, that's it.

Back in the 1970s when Pierco frames first came out, we noticed this right away. The frames had almost nothing where the top bar should be. We called them burr comb magnets. Later, the plastic foundations became available so you could combine them with the wood frame and reduce the burr comb to a non-issue.  Lots of burr comb is usually a sign of a good honey flow, so I wouldn't complain too much about that. 

I still use the one piece Pierco frames in my 6 5/8 supers, however. They have several good features. One, no assembly. Two, they hold more honey. You get significantly more honey per super with them, since they don't have the bars. I really don't like plastic frames in the brood nest, though, even if they hold more brood. But that's more an aesthetic thing, I reckon. They don't hurt anything

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2