Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:09:41 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>He does not link it with a particular practice. The resistance could have
come from other bacteria through Lateral Gene Transfer.
Not a question of where the gene (or allele) came from--as I understand it,
oxytetracycline is a natural product of *Streptococcus rimosus*, so there
likely have always been resistant bacteria. The question is selection
pressure. So long as TM was applied only once or twice a season, and due
to the fact that it rapidly degrades in the hive, natural selection would
have favored nonresistant bacteria if there was a fitness cost to carrying
the genes for resistance during times of lack of exposure.
Only when an antibiotic is present continually would there be a major
fitness advantage to resistant bacteria. The 24/365 application of
extender patties by some would have created such conditions. I doubt that
it is mere coincidence that resistant AFB appeared shortly after that
practice became common.
--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|