Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 2 May 2013 09:35:04 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I invented the liquid nitrogen freeze method while working on a project for
EPA. I found that neither the pin prick nor Steve Tabor's - cut and
freeze in freezer- produced consistent results. The problem is that physical
damage (pricking, cutting out bits of comb) can induce a repair behavior.
Hygenic behavior is supposedly controlled by two genes, each with a bit
different behavior. Also, removal of paper is probably not a good test -
its just part of a two step process.
As per area of brood - the larger the area you kill, the more certain you
will be to see bees take action - that's again not simply hygienic
behavior, but a response to a damage 'crisis'.
What most have forgotten - our data showed that several small patches over
more than on brood frame provided the most reliable test.
Medhat followed up our work with his butter dish, and we did something
similar with aluminum 'hockey' pucks.
Jerry
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|