BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Mon, 28 May 2012 08:37:42 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
>
> > Is it the concentration that is important or the total quantity
> gathered? The bees will concentrate it anyway, through evaporation and so
> the ppb expressed by the plant won't be the same as the ppb fed to the
> brood.


Good question Chris.  In the case of the study in question, wouldn't make
any difference, since the researchers were testing effects upon exposed
foragers, not on brood nor bees raised from exposed brood.

In addition, larvae are not fed honey.  Rather, and honey is diluted by the
nurse bees, so a concentration factor would not apply.

More generally, in typical feeding trials, the researchers use 1:1 (50%
w:w) sucrose solution.  If it were concentrated to the 83% sugar content of
honey, that would only be a concentration factor of about 1.6x, assuming
that in the process none of the pesticide was degraded.

So in answer to your question, in general, such potential concentration
would be a rather moot issue.  I hope that answers your question.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2